Opinion

New group hopes to help protect Iowa's first-in-the-nation caucuses

Then-Iowa Democratic Party Chairman Troy Price talks Feb. 7 with reporters about the results of the first-in-the-nation
Then-Iowa Democratic Party Chairman Troy Price talks Feb. 7 with reporters about the results of the first-in-the-nation Iowa precinct caucuses during a news conference in Des Moines. Price later resigned because of the debacle with tabulating results. (Rod Boshart/The Gazette)

Protecting Iowa’s first-in-the-nation caucus status is a 24/7/365 job.

Two more Iowans — a newspaper publisher and a journalist who was a campaign staffer — have signed on for the gig.

Keep Iowa First is described as a new, bipartisan think tank created to discuss ways to strengthen Iowa’s leadoff spot in the nation’s quadrennial presidential nominating process.

The group was formed by Douglas Burns, a columnist and co-owner of the Carroll Times Herald and Herald Publishing; and Brent Roske, a journalist whose work has appeared on WOI-TV in Des Moines and who briefly ran for Iowa governor and worked on John Delaney’s presidential campaign in Iowa.

When it comes to Iowa’s first-in-the-nation caucuses, the wolves are always at the door. This year, it seems like there are more wolves with longer fangs.

For a third consecutive caucus cycle, there was an issue reporting the results. In 2012, Republicans reported the wrong winner on caucus night. In 2016, it took Democrats until the wee hours of the next morning to announce a winner. And this year, a new computer program designed to calculate results of the Democratic caucuses crashed on caucus night. It took days for results to start trickling in, and weeks for all the results to be counted and challenged.

The cumulative effect is Iowa’s first-in-the-nation status is on even thinner ice than usual.

Burns and Roske formed Keep Iowa First in hopes of supporting any effort to preserve Iowa’s enviable position. They will use their media platforms to boost their efforts, they said in a news release. And they have launched the website keepiowafirst.org, which includes proposed caucus reforms and testimonials from political leaders.

“Iowans are suited for this work of sorting out the candidates in intimate settings, of plumbing beyond the talking points and digital ads and commercials,” Burns said. “Out-of-state technology let Iowa and the nation down in the 2020 caucuses, not Iowans. That can be corrected and updated with a bipartisan state agency and commission and full-time experts manning the helm. Our state owes the nation such a commitment, and after 50 years of playing this central role, we deserve the opportunity to continue with an improved process.”

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

Roske, a California native, said he was motivated in part by the Democratic Party’s national chairman, Tom Perez, who has suggested the party should move away from caucuses to be more inclusive.

Because of their unique structure, caucuses can be more difficult to take part in than a primary election.

“The tabulating error that happened last time isn’t a strong enough reason to scrap the whole thing. The caucus events ran perfectly. It was the digital tabulating — which the (national Democratic Party) demanded — which failed,” Roske said. “We need to simplify the process, have both the Republican and Democrat caucuses run by a bipartisan committee and operated with state funds to ensure transparency and accountability.”

Keep Iowa First’s website includes some significant proposed changes to the caucuses to preserve Iowa’s status: decrease the number of precincts from more than 1,700 to just one in each of the state’s 99 counties, work with cyber experts to protect digital operations, and scrap the Democratic Party’s complicated caucus process for the Republican Party’s simpler format.

Those are not minor tweaks; those are overhauls. But they’re worth the effort, Roske believes.

“Iowans of all political stripes need to realize that if Iowa loses the caucuses, our elected officials will have a diminished voice in Washington,” he said in an email. “Political calculus lends favor to Iowa initiatives because of the caucus influence. This is truly a bipartisan concern for all Iowans.”

No matter who wins the 2020 presidential election, there will surely be a large field of candidates competing in the 2024 race. It’s too early to tell whether Iowa will be in the pole position in four years. It will be a challenge to convince party leaders, especially in the Democratic Party, to take another chance after what happened in February. But politics often has a short memory — and Iowa, despite previous threats to its status, has thus far prevailed. Keep Iowa First is just one of the voices that will be weighing in to determine what happens down the road.

Erin Murphy covers Iowa politics and government. His column appears Monday in The Gazette. His email address is erin.murphy@lee.net. Follow him on Twitter at @ErinDMurphy.

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.