News

3 reasons farmers back President Trump on China trade

Aid helps, but research finds hopes for better future

Farmers harvest soybeans Oct. 13 north of Ely in Linn County. Over 80 percent of the 693 Iowa, Illinois and Minnesota fa
Farmers harvest soybeans Oct. 13 north of Ely in Linn County. Over 80 percent of the 693 Iowa, Illinois and Minnesota farmers who researchers from Iowa State University surveyed from February through June said trade disruptions had an adverse effect on their net farm income in 2018. Almost a third reported that their income dropped by over 20 percent. (Jim Slosiarek/The Gazette)

America’s farmers have borne the brunt of China’s retaliation in the trade war that President Donald Trump launched in 2018.

One reason: China is the biggest buyer in the world of many U.S. agricultural products, such as soybeans, grain sorghum, cotton and cattle hides, which made these products an obvious target for retaliatory tariffs.

The other related reason is more strategic: China hoped inflicting economic costs on U.S. farmers — who voted overwhelmingly for Trump in 2016 — would in turn put pressure on the president to end his trade war.

Although farmers have lost billions of dollars in exports, China’s strategy hasn’t created the intended effect — with surveys of farmers continuing to show strong support for the president.

We conducted our own survey of corn and soybean farmers. Published in October, it suggests three reasons why farmers support Trump’s trade policies despite the costs to them.

No. 1: Easing the pain

Undoubtedly, China’s retaliatory tariffs on almost all U.S. agricultural exports, most notably soybeans, feed grains and pork products, have been painful for farmers.

China bought anywhere from $20 billion to $26 billion worth of U.S. agricultural products a year from 2012 to 2017. But Chinese purchases plunged to $9.2 billion in 2018 and are on a slightly higher pace so far this year. Soybean exports from the United States alone fell 75 percent from 2017 to 2018.

Over 80 percent of the 693 Iowa, Illinois and Minnesota farmers we surveyed from February through June said trade disruptions had an adverse effect on their net farm income in 2018. Almost a third reported that their income dropped by over 20 percent.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

But the Trump administration’s efforts to ease their pain have paid off.

The administration gave soybean, sorghum and other farmers $12 billion in assistance in 2018, which the vast majority of our survey participants found useful. The survey was conducted before $16 billion more went to farmers this year, both to offset trade losses and the effects of too much rain.

No. 2: Long-term gains

We also found that farmers largely view the trade disruption as a short-term pain for a long-term gain.

While only 14 percent think their farm operations will be better off financially a year from now, more than half said they expected something good to ultimately come out of the trade war. About 44 percent said they believe the U.S. economy will be stronger in three years.

China’s 2017 decision to allow imports of U.S. beef and its 2020 national ethanol mandate also give farmers hope for new export opportunities.

In other words, most farmers are prepared to sacrifice income for a while on the belief they’ll make up for it down the road. Since agriculture is a highly cyclical industry, this sanguine view is understandable.

In fact, U.S. agricultural exports to China this year rebounded a bit compared with a year ago, thanks to China’s recent exemptions of tariffs on U.S. soybeans and pork products.

No. 3: Irks with China

Finally, we found a growing frustration with China’s erratic export buying behavior.

For example, China shut out U.S. beef for 14 years over a mad cow scare in 2003, keeping the ban more than a decade after other countries like Japan and South Korea lifted theirs.

Chinese agreements to purchase products such as distillers grains or corn sometimes just disappear. These may have been offshoots of adjustments China made to its corn support policy, but, from the perspective of U.S. farmers, Chinese demand for certain U.S. agricultural commodities has been annoyingly inconsistent.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

Although we didn’t ask survey participants a specific question on this topic, many farmers provided their own unsolicited comments that voiced this frustration.

“The Chinese do not play by the rules,” one Illinois farmer said. “They cancel shipment orders that are not in their favor. They continue to steal our patents. Only President Trump has tried to stop these unfair trade practices.”

Or as a farmer from Minnesota explained: “China imposed the tariffs and refused to buy soybeans in an attempt to hurt our agriculture and get us to turn against a president they do not want. They have been stealing technology and jobs for too long and giving us back inferior goods. Prior to this, they manipulated our markets by buying and then canceling or refusing shipments of grain.”

Possibility of relief

Our survey showed most farmers recognize that they will continue to be the biggest victims of the U.S.-China trade war and will likely lose markets — some permanently — as China diversifies away from American producers.

As one Illinois farmer who was less supportive of tariffs put it, “we are not the only game in town.” U.S. agricultural exports will face growing competition from Brazil on soybeans and from Europe and Australia on meat.

Yet 56 percent still said they supported imposing tariffs on Chinese products, while only 30 percent oppose them.

This article was written by Wendong Zhang, assistant professor of economics at Iowa State University; Lulu Rodriguez, global programs lead, Seed Science Center at ISU; and Shuyang Qu, assistant professor of agricultural communications at ISU. Articles for TheConversation.com are written by academics in conjunction with journalists.

Biggest slice of new trade aid comes to Iowa

DES MOINES — Iowa farmers are set to receive $767 million — the most of any state — in the latest round of government aid to offset damage from the U.S.’s ongoing trade war with China.

The direct payments, announced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, come from President Donald Trump’s $16 billion trade assistance program, the second round of trade aid so far.

The USDA shows that the other states getting the most federal assistance in this year’s program are Illinois at $707 million, Minnesota at $519 million, Texas at $497 million, Kansas at $474 million and Nebraska at $466 million.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa Soybean Association board President Tim Bardole said the additional payments will help but won’t solve all the problems farmers are having this year.

“I don’t know of any farmers who aren’t short of money right now,” said Bardole, who farms near Rippey.

Last year, U.S. farmers received about $8.6 billion in assistance during the first year of the trade war as part of a $12 billion aid package from the Trump administration. Iowa farmers received $987.7 million last time, second only to Illinois at $1.1 billion.

Story by The Associated Press

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.