Nation & World

Out of spotlight, tribes still fight Dakota Access pipeline

Federal judge expected to make key ruling by Aug. 10

Harold Frazier, center, chairman of the Cheyenne River Reservation, on April 27 wears his Lakota headdress and holds a staff just outside Fort Laramie, Wy. The April meeting in Laramie was the first time since the Standing Rock protests of 2016 and 2017 that all seven bands of the Great Sioux Nation were together. Frazier said convocation was a reminder for Native Americans that the federal government had fallen short of its agreements under the Laramie Treaty, including by approving the Dakota Access pipeline. (Stephanie Keith/Reuters)
Harold Frazier, center, chairman of the Cheyenne River Reservation, on April 27 wears his Lakota headdress and holds a staff just outside Fort Laramie, Wy. The April meeting in Laramie was the first time since the Standing Rock protests of 2016 and 2017 that all seven bands of the Great Sioux Nation were together. Frazier said convocation was a reminder for Native Americans that the federal government had fallen short of its agreements under the Laramie Treaty, including by approving the Dakota Access pipeline. (Stephanie Keith/Reuters)

Native American tribes that tried to block the Dakota Access oil pipeline during a monthslong standoff with authorities in North Dakota more than a year ago are carrying on their fight in federal court, in what they contend is a symbol of their struggle for tribal sovereignty.

“People think Standing Rock has come and gone,” said Danielle Ta’Sheena Finn, a spokeswoman for the Standing Rock Sioux, referring to the sight of the protests. “But we will continue this fight until we are heard and the world knows what happened to us.”

The underground pipeline, which crosses 18 counties in Iowa. has been operational since June 2017, after President Donald Trump granted its permit over the objections of tribes and environmentalists fearful it would pollute a waterway sacred to the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River Sioux.

The Standing Rock and Cheyenne Sioux sued the Army Corps of Engineers soon after Trump ordered it to approve the pipeline, arguing that the tribes had not been properly consulted.

The Corps is involved with military construction projects around the world and also advises civil engineering activities, such as dredging America’s waterways and cleaning up hazardous or toxic sites.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in Washington, D.C., is weighing whether the Corps adequately considered effects on the tribes before approving the pipeline, which is owned by Energy Transfer Partners of Texas. He is expected to rule by Aug. 10.

The Corps did not respond to a request for comment, but has previously said it worked diligently to meet obligations to tribes.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

The tribes have expressed hope that Boasberg will suspend operations on the 1,172-mile pipeline, which connects the Bakken shale oil fields of North Dakota with a distribution hub in Illinois.

Energy Transfer declined to comment, but has repeatedly said the pipeline would be safely operated.

LARAMIE AND A TREATY

Opposition to the pipeline played a key role in last spring’s gathering at Fort Laramie, Wy., to mark the 150th anniversary of a peace treaty between the Sioux Nation and the United States.

Under the treaty, the federal government recognized the Black Hills of the Dakota Territory as part of the Great Sioux Reservation and hostilities ended between the Sioux and white settlers.

The Sioux contend the pipeline was built on land they never gave up.

In 1868, their land included most of South Dakota and parts of Nebraska, Wyoming, Montana and North Dakota. It since has shrunken to several smaller reservations in the region.

The April meeting in Laramie was the first time since the Standing Rock protests of 2016 and 2017 that all seven bands of the Great Sioux Nation were together. Many veterans of the Standing Rock protests were there.

Members of the tribes rode hundreds of miles on horseback to get to Laramie, passing through tiny communities like Green Grass, S.D., the spiritual center of the Lakota People on the Cheyenne River Sioux reservation.

Tribal leaders expressed disappointment that no senior members of the Trump administration were at Fort Laramie to commemorate the milestone.

Harold Frazier, chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux, said the convocation was a reminder for Native Americans that the federal government had fallen short of its agreements under the Laramie Treaty, including by approving the Dakota Access pipeline.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

Thank you for signing up for our e-newsletter!

You should start receiving the e-newsletters within a couple days.

“They ought to be ashamed of themselves,” Frazier said. “They have a moral obligation to uphold the honor of the Great Sioux Nation.”

Ivan Lookinghorse, a medicine man from the Cheyenne River Reservation and an organizer of the ride to Laramie, said the tribes intended to use the momentum from that gathering to stay unified as they gear up to fight other projects they say threaten their well-being.

“We are going to keep it going, keep organizing meetings and find a way to be able to take care of the health and welfare of our people, and preserve land and water,” he said.

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.

CONTINUE READING

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.