Never stifle dissent

If recent White House attacks on Fox News are an attempt to shut down dissent, good luck with that.

One new poll, by Zogby International/O'Leary Report, reports that 53 percent of 3,544 U.S. voters surveyed last week believe the denigration of Fox indeed was an attempt by the Obama Administration to silence dissent. Even among Democrats, 48 percent agreed.

We're not sure of the White House's intent. But we do think that the administration's spokesmen should buck up. Criticism from the media isn't new to this presidency. TV commentators, print columnists and others have been at this for a long time.

The White House certainly has every right to vigorously defend and explain its policies and decisions. But it's not wise and crosses a free-speech principle when administration officials make such declarations that Fox News is not a “legitimate news organization” or their recent attempt to deny Fox an interview with Obama's executive pay czar (appropriately, other networks refused to participate unless Fox was permitted, and the administration backed down).

The White House should be more discerning. Differentiate between Fox News reporting as compared to its commentary shows and hosts. Debate or reject opposing views. Never advocate for shutting off dissent.

Free speech is part of our tradition. Our democracy. Protected by the Constitution.

Is it abused? Yes, often.

Would we prefer to have our viewpoints stifled if a president or anyone in power doesn't agree with them? Never.