Local decision

Gazette Editorial Board

---

A Senate subcommittee last month wisely dropped a proposal to ban traffic cameras in Iowa. Last week, a House committee approved legislation that would allow red-light and speed cameras but create statewide rules for all cities to follow.

We don't think this idea is appropriate or necessary either.

Most of the provisions in House Study Bill 93 already are being observed by the handful of cities using the cameras. Where is the evidence of their inappropriate use?

The bill also would cap the civil fine for running a red light at $50. Why is that the magic figure? It maybe too little to be an effective deterrent in Cedar Rapids, where the fine is $100. And remember, the vendor who provides the cameras systems must be paid.

But the amount and other operational details are for city councils to decide and their constituents to effect through feedback or the ballot box.

Cedar Rapids' one-year-old experiment with the cameras has produced opponents but no widespread cry to end it. Police statistics show fewer crashes, and average traffic speed along the dangerous downtown I-380 S curve has been significantly reduced. The city's revenue, at more than $2.3 million, goes to the general fund to ease pressure to raise property taxes.

So, just why is it that the state needs to step in?

n Comments: thegazette.com/

category/opinion/editorial or

editorial@sourcemedia.net