116 3rd St SE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401
Home / Opinion / Staff Columnists
Fun with Numbers -- Constitutional Conventions

Feb. 9, 2010 5:22 pm
Every 10 years, Iowans are asked whether they want to pop the hood on the state's constitution by calling a constitutional convention. The issue will be on the ballot this fall.
The gay marriage debate has some folks talking about the possibility of approving a convention to take up the issue. But historically, Iowans have been very reluctant to go down that road.
Here are the results of the last 10 Con Con votes:
Year Yes No
1900 176,337 176,892
1910 134,983 166,054
1920 279,652 221,763
1930 140,667 195,356
1940 199,247 352,142
1950 221,189 319,704
1960 469,463 530,915
1970 204,517 214,663
1980 404,249 640,130
1990 179,762 491,179
2000 306,468 622,256
(Sources: Iowa Secretary of State, Iowa Official Register, Cedar Rapids Gazette archives)
Iowa's last constitutional convention was in 1857. A convention did win the majority support of voters in 1920. But it was never held.
The late, great Statehouse scribe Harrison Weber explained the 1920 punt in a story that ran in The Gazette on Sept. 28, 1970:
The Iowa Farm Bureau Federation was concerned that it did not have legal authority to establish farmer cooperatives.
It was feared that co-ops, without capital stock and not operated for profit, would be held illegal under Iowa's constitution on the grounds they were operating in restraint of trade.
But it was determined during the 1921 legislative session that farmer co-ops could be set up without violating the provisions of the constitution, so the legislature passed a law which took care of the problem.
Consequently there was no big demand for a constitutional convention and the issue withered on the political vine and a convention was not held, nor has one been held since.
On Election Day 1970, it looked like a convention had been approved. This story appeared on The Gazette's front page on Nov. 4, 1970:
Calling of Convention Is Favored
DBS MOINES (AP) - To the "complete amazement and surprise" of Secretary of State Melvin Synhorst, Iowa voters Tuesday said they want a constitutional convention, a vote that could make major headlines from the election.
Both major parties and a number of civic groups all had recommended that the question- required on the ballot every 10 years as a matter of form - be defeated.
Synhorst called the vote "really quite a shocker" and said "I don't think anybody even thought this could occur."
Voters gave the measure a slim margin, with 150,797 votes in favor to 149,921 against, with 67.7 percent of precincts reporting.
Synhorst said the vote means the next legislature must call a constitutional convention and prescribe a method for selecting delegates. The convention is to propose amendments to the constitution, and those amendments are to be put to the electorate.
Wide Open
"This breaks the whole thing wide open," said Synhorst.
Quizzed about speculation some voters may have been confused on the issue, Synhorst said "we have to presume this is the will of the people though I have some personal doubts about it ... This just points up the need for a good explanation on the ballot of every constitutional amendment."
Newsmen had speculated that some voters may have confused the convention call with three relatively noncontroversial constitutional amendments on the ballot.
The three amendments had bipartisan support, and none had drawn any reported opposition. All passed with solid majorities, and it was thought many -voters who approved the proposal may have mistakenly approved the convention call as well.
A spirited campaign to call such a convention failed in I960.
Three counties reporting in the incomplete returns - Johnson, Mitchell and Grundy - showed majorities of more than 60 percent favoring the move, sparking some speculation of a miniresurgence of advocates for the proposal.
The amazement and surprise didn't last long. When the votes were canvassed a week later, it turned out that the con con had failed. Not exactly "Dewey Defeats Truman," but interesting.
The last time there was a serious campaign calling for a convention was in 1980, when Iowans for Tax Relief founder David Stanley led the charge for constitutional limits on government taxing power. The effort had the backing of the Iowa Farm Bureau, among other groups, but failed.
Gov. Robert Ray was opposed the idea, and so were most Iowans, even though early polls showed support for Stanley's propoals.
Coverage at the time said opponents of the 1980 convention raised serious questions about how it would be structured and conducted. (I can remember seeing "Vote No No on Con Con" bumper stickers as a kid) In the end, Iowans were skittish about popping the hood.
Opinion content represents the viewpoint of the author or The Gazette editorial board. You can join the conversation by submitting a letter to the editor or guest column or by suggesting a topic for an editorial to editorial@thegazette.com