Goldberg: States’ rights, ‘sanctuary cities’ and ‘Nuclear Free Zones’

By Jonah Goldberg

I've got a proposal for you. I'd call it a “modest proposal” but, thanks to Jonathan Swift, when writers say that, it means they're about to propose something absolutely bonkers to make a satirical point along the lines of “Let's eat Irish babies!” or “Joe Biden should be president!”

My proposal might still be crazy, but it's not satire. OK, OK, I can tell you're keen to hear it.

But wait. First, a peeve.

The president and his party jammed through health-care legislation that was objectively unpopular with the American people. It stipulates that it is essentially illegal not to have health insurance. A dozen or so states are suing on the grounds that the federal government doesn't have the right to force people to buy health insurance.

The response from ObamaCare backers has been one of sanctimonious derision. To pick just one example, the current issue of The New Republic features an essay claiming this legal effrontery marks a return of the Confederacy's racist doctrine of nullification. The “new nullifiers,” exclaims liberal historian Sean Wilentz, “would have us repudiate the sacrifices of American history - and subvert the constitutional pillars of American nationhood.”

Forget that when George W. Bush was in office, standing athwart the government was all the rage. Liberals talked about Blue State secession from “Jesusland.” The New York Times ran a letter to the “states' rights left” by contributor Jim Holt arguing “states' rights has not always been the intellectual property of reactionaries.”

But forget all that. Consider that even now there are more than 30 so-called “sanctuary cities” that formally ban their own police from enforcing federal immigration laws or even cooperating with federal officers trying to enforce them. But not a peep about “nullification.”

Ditto when it comes to the countless hippy-dippy “Nuclear Free Zones” that dot the American landscape in defiance of the federal government's rights to provide for defense and ensure interstate commerce.

But when the state of Arizona opts to pass a popular law requiring Arizonan officials to enforce federal law, all of the usual suspects come completely unglued. Police will be allowed to ask people for their “papers”! Gird your loins for Gotterdammerung!

Forget being a throwback to the Confederacy, the sanctimony choir cries out that Arizona has rematerialized as 1940 Berlin. Ironic, since the requirement that legal immigrants carry their “papers” at all times was signed into law by FDR that very year.

Linda Greenhouse, longtime Supreme Court reporter for the New York Times and currently a Yale law professor, penned an op-ed in which she emoted that Arizona has become a Nazi-esque “police state” where it is a crime to be “breathing while undocumented.”

That bit about “breathing while undocumented” strikes a chord. Because, you see, under ObamaCare, it is now something of a crime to “breath while uninsured,” too.

So here's where that wacky proposal I mentioned earlier comes in. Let's throw it all back to the states. Arizona can be an illegal-immigrant-free zone and New York can hold an open house for everyone. The same goes for health care. States that want universal health care can provide it, including to illegal immigrants. Other states can let the market rule.

If it were up to me, the feds would still enforce basic civil rights, provide for the common defense and protect interstate commerce, but beyond that, let freedom reign.

Unfortunately, for progressives, that's crazier than a “Biden 2016” bumper sticker.

n Comments: jonahscolumn@aol.com