Teacher shouldn’t fine over poor language

In response to the May 8 article titled “It's, like, not cool to misuse ‘like' in this class” about Phil Davies, assistant professor, Tippie College of Business at the University of Iowa: Could the news editor explain why the reporter didn't present the University of Iowa administration's opinion or any contrary perspective?

I was aghast at the audacity of this professor to create and implement an ad hoc language policy. As an undergraduate French student on the UI campus in the 1980s, I understand methods evaluating language proficiency.

It is with great relief that I was never fined for an incorrect conjugation of a verb or misuse of a feminine/masculine article. No doubt, many French professors would have relished a fee-based negative–reinforcement behavior modification plan.

My guess is that the same policies guiding their instruction then exist now. In the 1980s, when language skills failed to meet the professor's standards, the indiscretion would be reflected in the student's grade.

Davies' actions should be reviewed, as they likely violate university policy and could be considered coercive or even unlawful. Fees taxed within a UI classroom are legally funds owed to the university. If there is any policy violation or misuse of funds, these business students should be reimbursed and receive an apology from Davies.

Stephanie L. Sueppel

Iowa City