Don’t rush to overhaul decent health coverage

It is important for the loyal opposition to continue to reflect the legitimate concerns of millions of citizens that seem to be brushed aside by the media and those in control. They must not be pressured into rushing into health care legislation for which details are open to question or altogether missing. What is the rush?

Our system can use some major adjustments but it is the most effective in the world, so we should not imitate others. Unintended consequences can impact large segments of the population negatively. For one thing, there are not enough doctors and nurses to provide all that the planners want to promise.

As for saving money through increased efficiency, where is the evidence first of a system for increasing efficiency, and then for correlating it with savings?

Congress could initiate cost savings by changing the tax structure so individuals have the same opportunity as business to get tax credits for their own insurance, and taking charge of their own health. And to expect insurance to cover every minor, routine visit to the doctor closes the door to savings. State borders should not be a barrier to insurance companies.

Another way to cut costs is to control contingency fees and settlements in malpractice suits. Much more important than insurance is emphasis on achieving good health, which depends on individual responsibility. Good health cannot be legislated, purchased or given away. It must be earned.

Margaret S. Emmons

Retired M.D.

Iowa City