What does commitment mean in youth sports?

Commitment. Webster’s American Dictionary defines it as: “To pledge (oneself) to a position on some issue.”

Pretty simple.

I would submit that we commit ourselves to various issues and situations each and every day. I believe commitment takes resolve, perseverance, grit — and a passion for whatever you are committing to.

What does this have to do with youth sports?

Athletes and parents make commitments every time they sign up to play on a team. Parents commit to time, money and support of their children. Players commit to time, training and to be there for their teammates.

Any slack off to any of that commitment affects the entire organization. At what age does that commitment allow for absences or excuses, apart from family emergencies, illness or other important situations that may arise?

One of my disappointments — or pet peeves — revolves around commitment in youth sports.

As I have mentioned in previous columns, I have a seventh-grade grandson who is quite talented when it comes to sports. He is participating in three sports — football, basketball and track. He takes it very seriously, as do his parents. Justin (not his real name) is not forced to play sports, he does it because he loves competition, likes being around his friends and sees a future in continuing to play in college.

Obviously, participating in three sports is a huge outlay of money and time for his parents and a huge time commitment for Justin. I don’t believe in specialization at early ages, but playing and/or practicing for three sports at the same time can be exhausting.

One day each week, Justin has a one-on-one basketball workout before school with a former collegiate player in order to improve his skill. Then he has track practice after school and, about 90 minutes later, he has basketball practice for team ball.

The rest of the week is not as intense.

Recently, his basketball team participated in its first tournament of the spring and summer — five hours away. It was guaranteed a minimum of four games. Before leaving for the tournament, Justin and his dad were told scouts and coaches would be attending the tournament (scouts watching middle school kids, that’s for another discussion) and that only six of the team members would be playing.

Where were the remaining members of the team, including a starting point guard and center?

My question is this. Was traveling to the tournament a waste of time and money without a full complement of players?

As was predictable, the team went 1-3. The team was down to just five players after one was injured and were forced to play out-of-position. They were exhausted by the end of competition.

Winning is not the most important thing in youth sports, but everyone wants to win. At this level of play, no matter the age, winning is important.

If a commitment is made to the coach and players, should all players not have been involved? Most coaches at this level are volunteers or minimally compensated for their time and effort in working with the kids.

I have mixed emotions about what commitment means at this age and level. Some might say if the kids want to play, let them play. They might learn more by being forced to play other positions.

But do the positives outweigh the negatives?

Nancy Justis is a former competitive swimmer and college sports information director. She is a partner with Outlier Creative Communications. Let her know what you think at njustis@cfu.net