116 3rd St SE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401
Home / News / Government & Politics
Iowa to electronically track key meth ingredient in July

Apr. 13, 2010 4:15 pm
DES MOINES – Iowa's drug czar testified Tuesday he is hopeful that the July implementation of an electronic tracking system for a key meth-making ingredient will help curtail a “modest resurgence” of clandestine methamphetamine labs in Iowa.
Gary Kendell, Iowa drug policy coordinator, told members of the U.S. Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control in Washington D.C. that Iowa and other states have made progress in combating methamphetamine, but he cautioned that resilient meth cooks and their clandestine labs continue to pose dangers in America. He also noted that much of the meth found in Iowa is imported into the state rather than produced locally.
In prepared remarks, Kendell voiced support for a technology tool to help enforce existing laws regulating pseudoephedrine, a key meth-making ingredient found in many cold and allergy products. He said he preferred that to a prescription-only approach that Oregon adopted and Congress is considering adopting as a nationwide policy.
“Since sweeping state and federal laws to control pseudoephedrine were enacted nearly five years ago, the number of meth labs in Iowa has dropped 82 percent, from a peak of 125 labs per month in 2004 to an average of about 22 a month in 2009,” Kendell said. “The drop in meth labs also resulted in a reduction in meth-related treatment and prison admissions, as well as fewer meth-related child abuse cases in Iowa.
“However, Iowa has seen a modest resurgence of meth labs in each of the last two years, due largely to an increase in pharmacy-hopping, or ‘smurfing,' by meth cooks who realize pharmacies are unable to share pseudoephedrine purchase log information,” he added. “We plan to close that gap beginning this summer, when Iowa implements a real-time electronic Pseudoephedrine Tracking System to prevent or detect illegal activity.”
Iowa and federal laws currently restrict pseudoephedrine products to behind sales counters, impose daily and monthly purchase limits, and require purchaser IDs and signatures on logs. Participation by doctors and other prescribers in the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program is voluntary, and law enforcement access to the information is severely limited.
As the only state that currently requires a prescription to buy products containing pseudoephedrine, Oregon has reported the largest percent reduction in meth labs. Kendell gave Oregon officials credit for making the prescription-only approach work so far in their state, but he cautioned “going down this road on a large scale basis right now and expecting similar results.”
“Requiring a prescription for pseudoephedrine would impose greater restrictions on consumer access to cold and allergy products, and we know from the seemingly increasing diversion of painkillers that prescription drugs are not immune from abuse,” he said.
“I believe the electronic pseudoephedrine tracking system should be given a chance to work first, and I hope other states will join Iowa and others that have already committed to this approach,” added Kendell. “Should this strategy prove ineffective, prescription only should remain an option for future consideration, especially if all states implement mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs that are connected for real-time information sharing between pharmacies and law enforcement agencies.”
Comments: (515) 243-7220;