116 3rd St SE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401
Home / Opinion / Guest Columnists
The lamp and the ledger: What Florence Nightingale would see in Iowa
Dr. Christopher R. Crossett
Nov. 30, 2025 7:51 am
The Gazette offers audio versions of articles using Instaread. Some words may be mispronounced.
In the winter of 1858, a nurse sat beneath the dim light of a London lamp, charting the causes of death among British soldiers. Florence Nightingale’s diagrams were simple circles of ink — blue for disease, red for battle — but they told a shattering truth: more soldiers were dying from neglect and poor sanitation than from combat itself. When the British Parliament saw her data, policy changed. Hospitals were cleaned, mortality fell, and statistics became instruments of conscience.
A century and a half later, Iowa faces its own arithmetic of denial.
At a recent town hall in Keosauqua, Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks defended sweeping Medicaid reductions as a plan to “strengthen and preserve” the program. She spoke of sustainability and fraud prevention. She invoked community-engagement requirements, stricter eligibility checks, and a “Medicaid Improvement Act.” The phrases sounded managerial, even reassuring — until one examines the figures behind them.
According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the law she helped advance will reduce federal Medicaid funding by roughly $900 billion over the next decade. Independent analysts estimate about 10 million Americans will lose coverage by 2034. In Iowa alone, hospitals anticipate $2.7 billion in lost reimbursement and tens of thousands of rural residents cut from the rolls. Calling that preservation is like calling Nightingale’s mortality charts decorative art.
Nightingale understood what happens when institutions hide behind euphemism. She faced generals who blamed “fate” for preventable deaths. Today’s policymakers invoke “efficiency” and “sustainability,” as if the spreadsheet were sterile ground. But in rural counties, where one closure can erase a maternity ward or rehabilitation unit, budget math is as mortal as infection once was.
When questioned about the expiration of enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies, Miller-Meeks dismissed them as “corporate welfare” benefiting “a minimal number of people.” Yet those credits kept millions of families insured; without them, out-of-pocket premiums are expected to rise 75% or more, pricing many out of coverage entirely. To reduce health policy to a profit ledger is to forget that every cell in Nightingale’s diagrams represented a life that bureaucracy once found expendable.
The congresswoman also touted a new Rural Health Transformation Fund — a five-year, $50 billion program — to offset the fallout. Iowa has applied for $1 billion. It sounds promising until one compares it with the $137 billion in rural Medicaid cuts embedded in the same legislation. A one-time grant cannot disinfect a chronic wound.
After once joking she’d hold public town halls “when hell freezes over,” Miller-Meeks finally did — but with prescreened questions and a moderator controlling the floor. Transparency cannot exist in quarantine. Nightingale carried her lamp into the wards because she knew what darkness protected: denial.
Every elected official has the right to defend hard choices. But integrity requires speaking in ratios that match reality. If strengthening Medicaid means cutting it by nearly a trillion dollars, say so. If preserving rural access means offering a temporary fund that covers a third of projected losses, admit it. If lowering costs means ending the very subsidies that kept families insured, own that, too.
From a clinical vantage point, the pattern is familiar. Paperwork and politics never healed a patient. I’ve watched recoveries unravel when a rule changed mid-treatment or a coverage line disappeared. That experience shapes this appeal — not for sympathy, but for accuracy. In public office, as in nursing, outcomes depend on candor. If leaders ask for trust, they owe truth in return.
Florence Nightingale once wrote that “to understand God’s thoughts, we must study statistics, for these are the measure of His purpose.” She meant that numbers reveal moral order when honestly observed. Iowa’s leaders could borrow her lamp — or at least her honesty — before more of our neighbors become data points in a chart no one wants to draw.
Dr. Christopher R. Crossett, DNP, MBA, MSN, RN, CRRN, is a board-certified rehabilitation nurse and health-systems leader based in Cedar Rapids. He writes on transparency, accountability, and access to care in Iowa’s hospitals and rehabilitation programs.
Opinion content represents the viewpoint of the author or The Gazette editorial board. You can join the conversation by submitting a letter to the editor or guest column or by suggesting a topic for an editorial to editorial@thegazette.com

Daily Newsletters