116 3rd St SE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401
Home / ‘Avatar’ worth the millions of dollars it took to make it
‘Avatar’ worth the millions of dollars it took to make it
Diana Nollen
Dec. 17, 2009 9:54 am
By Roger Ebert
Universal Press Syndicate
Watching “Avatar,” I felt sort of the same as when I saw “Star Wars” in 1977. That was another movie I walked into with uncertain expectations.
James Cameron's film has been the subject of relentlessly dubious advance buzz, just as his “Titanic” was. Once again, he has silenced the doubters by simply delivering an extraordinary film. There is still at least one man in Hollywood who knows how to spend $250 million, or was it $300 million, wisely.
“Avatar” is not simply a sensational entertainment, although it is that. It's a technical breakthrough. It has a flat-out Green and anti-war message. It is predestined to launch a cult. It contains such visual detailing that it would reward repeated viewings. It invents a new language, Na'vi, as “The Lord of the Rings” did. It creates new movie stars.
It is an Event, one of those films you feel you must see to keep up with the conversation.
The story, set in the year 2154, involves a mission by U.S. Armed Forces to an Earth-sized moon in orbit around a massive star. This new world, Pandora, is a rich source of a mineral Earth desperately needs.
Pandora represents not even a remote threat to Earth, but we nevertheless send in the military to attack and conquer them. Gung-ho Marines employ machine guns and pilot armored hover ships on bombing runs. You are free to find this an allegory about contemporary politics. Cameron obviously does.
Pandora harbors a planetary forest inhabited peacefully by the Na'vi, a blue-skinned, golden-eyed race of slender giants, each one perhaps 12 feet tall. The atmosphere is not breathable by humans, and the landscape makes us pygmies.
To venture out of our landing craft, we use avatars - Na'vi look-alikes grown organically and mind-controlled by humans who remain wired up in a trance-like state on the ship. While acting as avatars, they see, fear, taste and feel like Na'vi, and have all the same physical adeptness.
This last quality is liberating for the hero, Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), who is a paraplegic. He's been recruited because he's a genetic match for a dead identical twin, for whom an expensive avatar was created. In avatar state he can walk again, and as his payment for this duty he will be given a very expensive operation to restore movement to his legs.
In theory he's in no danger because if his avatar in destroyed, his human form remains untouched. In theory.
On Pandora, Jake begins as a good soldier and then goes native after his life is saved by the lithe and brave Neytiri (Zoe Saldana). He finds it is indeed true, as the aggressive Col. Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang) briefed them, that nearly every species of life here wants him for lunch.
The Na'vi survive on this planet by knowing it well, living in harmony with nature, and being wise about the creatures they share with. In this and countless other ways they resemble Native Americans. Like them, they tame another species to carry them around - not horses, but graceful, flying dragon-like creatures. The scene involving Jake capturing and taming one of these great beasts is one of the film's greatest sequences.
Like “Star Wars” and “LOTR,” “Avatar” employs a new generation of special effects. Pandora is largely CGI. The Na'vi are embodied through motion-capture techniques, convincingly. They look like specific, persuasive individuals, yet sidestep the eerie Uncanny Valley effect. And Cameron and his artists succeed at the difficult challenge of making Neytiri a green-skinned giantess with golden eyes and a long, supple tail, and yet sexy.
At 163 minutes, the film doesn't feel too long. It contains so much. The human stories. The Na'vi stories, for the Na'vi are also developed as individuals. The complexity of the planet, which harbors a global secret. The ultimate warfare, with Jake joining the resistance against his former comrades. Small graceful details like a floating creature that looks like a cross between a blowing dandelion seed and a drifting jellyfish, and embodies goodness. Or astonishing floating cloud-islands.
I've complained that many recent films abandon storytelling in their third acts and go for wall-to-wall action. Cameron essentially does that here, but has invested well in establishing his characters so that it matters what they do in battle and how they do it. There are issues at stake greater than simply which side wins.
Cameron promised he'd unveil the next generation of 3-D in “Avatar.” I'm a notorious skeptic about this process, a needless distraction from the perfect realism of movies in 2-D.
Cameron's iteration is the best I've seen - and more important, one of the most carefully employed. The film never uses 3-D simply because it has it, and doesn't promiscuously violate the fourth wall. He also seems quite aware of 3-D's weakness for dimming the picture, and even with a film set largely in interiors and a rain forest, there's sufficient light. I saw the film in 3-D on a good screen and was impressed.
It takes a hell of a lot of nerve for a man to stand up at the Oscars broadcast and proclaim himself King of the World. James Cameron just got re-elected.
FAST TAKERoger Ebert says: ****
What: “Avatar”
Stars: Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Sigourney Weaver, Stephen Lang, Michelle Rodriguez, Giovanni Ribisi, Joel David Moore, CCH Pounder, Wes Studi, Laz Alonso
Where: Galaxy 16 Cine and Wynnsong 12 in Cedar Rapids; Sycamore 12 in Iowa City; Coral Ridge 10 in Coralville
Rated: PG-13
(McClatchy Newspapers) With computer effects, Sam Worthington (left) and Zoe Saldana become aliens in James Cameron's “Avatar.”