If gun owners’ names printed, why not more?

I want to applaud The Gazette for publishing the names of citizens who are granted a permit to carry concealed weapons. However, The Gazette needs to expand this service for those who are concerned with the potentially problematic behaviors of their neighbors. Every individual who might pose a problem should first be investigated by the government before they are issued a license/permit to engage in certain actions.

Since religion can be so contentious and harmful to society (the Crusades, Inquisition, jihads), those who are properly vetted and granted permits/licenses to establish a church, attend worship services, purchase holy texts, read/carry such texts in public, and otherwise to practice their religious beliefs should have their names published in The Gazette.

Given how harmful some speech can be, those who are properly vetted and then granted permits/licenses to speak in public; to create or buy books, magazines, music, movies, use the Internet, etc.; to read/use such items in public; to publish or sell such items should have their names published in The Gazette (including The Gazette's permit).

Given potential problems, citizens who are properly vetted and then granted permits/licenses by the government to peacefully assemble; petition the government; avoid unreasonable searches and seizures; avoid self-incrimination and double jeopardy; obtain due process; have an impartial jury trial, etc. should have their names published in The Gazette.

Those who ... no, wait. What? Fundamental, natural rights don't work this way? Imagine that.

Russell Madden

Cedar Rapids