116 3rd St SE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401
Home / Opinion / Staff Editorials
Court gets it right on sentencing
                                The Gazette Editorial Board 
                            
                        Jul. 25, 2014 1:00 am
When it comes to criminal sentencing, juveniles are different.
That's the basic conclusion reached by a majority of Iowa Supreme Court justices last week when they ruled that mandatory minimum sentences for young offenders are unconstitutional. The state court ruling comes after a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings staking out differences between adult and juvenile punishment, including a 2012 ruling striking down life without parole for juvenile offenders.
Iowa's ruling plows new ground in rejecting any mandatory sentences for juveniles. That goes too far in the minds of three dissenting Iowa justices. But we agree with Chief Justice Mark Cady. 'Mandatory minimum sentences for juveniles are simply too punitive for what we know about juveniles,” he wrote in the majority opinion.
The court's ruling does not mean that courts cannot sentence juveniles to severe punishment for heinous crimes when circumstances demand it. What it does mean is that those circumstances must be considered. And that's not possible when our laws mandate rigid sentences, rather than granting courts discretion to consider all the facts and decide what punishment actually fits the crime.
In the U.S. Supreme Court's 2012 decision on life sentences, it ruled that courts must consider an offender's maturity, education, home life and other factors. It makes legal sense that those same individual circumstances be considered in all juvenile cases.
This isn't a soft-on-crime ruling. It's a long overdue pushback against an era of mandatory sentences approved by lawmakers hoping to appear tough on crime, while giving too little consideration of how those laws would affect the state's ability to provide justice and punish offenders.
Our one-size-fits-all sentencing trend has led to numerous unintended consequences. The court has now tackled a major one. We hope this ruling prompts state lawmakers to rethink adult mandatory sentencing structures.
Lawmakers should also take this opportunity to think hard about the state's juvenile justice system. With the court's ruling, and the continuing saga of Iowa's shuttered juvenile home for girls in Toledo, Statehouse leaders have a clear opportunity to address serious problems with how Iowa handles and rehabilitates its youngest offenders.
' Comments: (319) 398-8262 or editorial@thegazette.com
                 Supporters of placing a copy of the Ten Commandments in the new Iowa judicial building gather during a rally, Thursday, Sept. 18, 2003, in Des Moines, Iowa. More than 200 Christian conservatives held the rally demanding that the Supreme Court display a framed copy of the Ten Commandments donated to the state. (AP Photo/The Des Moines Register, Gary Fandel)                             
Opinion content represents the viewpoint of the author or The Gazette editorial board. You can join the conversation by submitting a letter to the editor or guest column or by suggesting a topic for an editorial to editorial@thegazette.com

                                        
                        
								        
									
																			    
										
																		    
Daily Newsletters