116 3rd St SE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401
Home / Opinion / Guest Columnists
Government intervention wrecking U.S. health care
The Gazette Opinion Staff
Aug. 9, 2009 12:31 am
By Yaron Brook
Nearly half of all spending on health care in America is already government spending. Yet President Obama's “reforms” will only expand that intervention.
Before the government's entrance into medicine, health care was regarded as a product to be traded voluntarily on a free market - no different from food, clothing, or any other important good or service. Medical providers competed to provide the best-quality services at the lowest possible prices. Virtually all Americans could afford basic health care, while those few who could not were able to rely on abundant private charity.
Had this freedom been allowed to endure, Americans' rising productivity would have afforded them better and better health care, just as, today, we buy better and more varied food and clothing than people did a century ago.
But by the time Medicare and Medicaid were enacted in 1965, this view of health care as an economic product - for which each individual must assume responsibility - had given way to a view of health care as a “right,” an unearned “entitlement,” to be provided at others' expense.
This entitlement mentality fueled the rise of our current third party-payer system, a blend of government programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, together with government-controlled employer-based health insurance.
The resulting system aimed to relieve the individual of the “burden” of paying for his own health care by coercively imposing its costs on his neighbors. Today, for every dollar's worth of hospital care a patient consumes, that patient pays only about 3 cents out of pocket; the rest is paid by third-party coverage. And for the health care system as a whole, patients pay only about 14 percent.
Shifting the responsibility for health care costs away from the individuals who accrue them led to an explosion in spending. In a system in which someone else is footing the bill, consumers, encouraged to regard health care as a “right,” demand medical services without having to consider their real price.
When, through the 1970s and 1980s, this artificially inflated consumer demand sent expenditures soaring out of control, the government cracked down by enacting further coercive measures: price controls on medical services, cuts to medical benefits, and a crushing burden of regulations on every aspect of the health care system.
As each new intervention further distorted the health care market, driving up costs and lowering quality, belligerent voices demanded still further interventions to preserve the “right” to health care: from regulations mandating various forms of insurance coverage to President George Bush's massive prescription drug bill.
The solution to this ongoing crisis is to recognize there can be no such thing as a right to products or services created by the effort of others, and this most definitely includes medical products and services. Rights, as the Founding Fathers conceived them, are not claims to economic goods, but to freedoms of action.
You are free to see a doctor and pay him for his services. But you do not have a right to force the doctor to treat you without charge or to force others to pay for your treatment.
Real and lasting solutions to our health care problems require a rejection of the entitlement mentality in favor of a proper conception of rights. This would provide the moral basis for breaking the regulatory chains stifling the medical industry; for lifting the tax and regulatory incentives fueling our dysfunctional, employer-based insurance system; for inaugurating a gradual phaseout of all government health care programs, especially Medicare and Medicaid; and for restoring a true free market in medical care.
Such sweeping reforms would provide the freedom for entrepreneurs motivated by profit to compete with each other to offer the best-quality medical services at the lowest prices, driving innovation and bringing affordable medical care, once again, within the reach of all Americans.
Yaron Brook is the president of the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights. Visit www.aynrand.org for more information.
Opinion content represents the viewpoint of the author or The Gazette editorial board. You can join the conversation by submitting a letter to the editor or guest column or by suggesting a topic for an editorial to editorial@thegazette.com

Daily Newsletters