Answers: Metal Detectors

In light of the recent shooting at the Jackson County Courthouse as well as past violent actions in other public spaces, do you think metal detectors should be more commonplace? Do such measures keep the public safer or are they an ineffective taxpayer expense?

FROM our inbox

I think it's normal for metal detectors to be in courthouses and schools along with 24/7 security at a courthouse. This is just what I'm use to since I grew up in the suburbs of Chicago. The courthouse had metal detectors and a security staff - some schools had the same. So, it was a big shock to move here and see how lax security is at some facilities. It is a shame we can't trust each other more, but safety for all is a must.

Amy Mousel

Waterloo

'''

I don't believe that more metal detectors are the answer for the following reasons:

1) I believe that statistics have shown violent crime is decreasing. A factor in the perceived threat is one of a more connected society. We hear of every instance of violence throughout the world in a matter of minutes.

2) The violence is a symptom of a larger problem. Because of the perceived threat, government distances itself from the public, which in turn begets more feelings of mistrust.

3) The elephant in the room is the need for better mental health services. Such services seem to be the most available after an act of violence.

In a nutshell, treating the symptoms of society will not produce a better society.

Mary Nelson

Cedar Rapids

'''

I can understand the need for the use of metal detectors in high-risk areas, such as in jails. I think their use in the courthouse, city hall, etc. is excessive - hesitant to use the word 'overkill” - as they become yet another wall of separation between 'We the people” and our elected/government officials.

It is ridiculous I have to pass through them, and have to remove belts and so-forth, to get to small claims court, access court records, pay fines or conduct other business.

Perhaps their use could be justified in specific instances, such as in high-profile or infamous crime trials or when a specific and credible threat is known. Otherwise, what's next? Food-tasters for our mayors, armored limos for our county supervisors, MRAP's for our state legislators?

Joe Stutler

Marion

'''

FROM FACEBOOK

' Denny F.:

I believe they serve a definite purpose and should be encouraged. Their sensitivity needs to be refined though with everyone wearing belts and watches or carrying change in their pockets.. As the adage goes: an ounce of caution is worth a pound of cure. Ask Gabby Gifford.

' Ken E.:

Instead of metal detectors, the courthouses should have body X-ray machines the same as the airports have. The question should not be if the country needs more metal detectors, but rather if this country needs less concealed carry permits and guns in the hands of nuts and wackos.

' Dan L.:

I am surprised that all courts do not have them already.

' Justin D.:

The man who shot at the assessor and killed himself didn't have a concealed carry permit. I become one of the most passive people you'd ever meet when I'm carrying my firearm. I know several people with permits. None of them are 'wackos.”