Iowa DOT traffic camera ruling is reasonable

In 2013, when the Iowa Department of Transportation wrote new rules governing the use of automated traffic enforcement cameras, we saw the move as unnecessary meddling in local decision making.

We figured the stringent rules and reporting requirements were an attempt by the Branstad administration to achieve through administrative rules what it couldn't get from the Legislature, namely a ban on the use of cameras to catch speeders. We believed the decision on camera use should be left to local officials. In Cedar Rapids, the camera program was largely a settled issue when the DOT intervened.

But to the DOT's credit, it hasn't turned out that way.

Last week, the department at long last issued its directives on Cedar Rapids' speed camera program along I-380. The DOT is directing the city to move two speed cameras closer to the entrances of downtown's accident-prone S-curve. Those moves would put the cameras in compliance with a rule requiring them to be placed at least 1,000 feet from a speed limit change.

And the department has ordered the city to remove two cameras that catch speeders after they leave the S-curve, contending that they aren't needed to enhance highway safety.

We find these DOT directives to be entirely reasonable and measured. Instead of a state power grab, the department has used its rules to exercise a needed check on whether cameras are truly being used to enhance public safety, not just generate revenue.

It makes sense to move the cameras approaching the S-curve, giving drivers a reasonable distance to slow down while still providing the sort of deterrent that has cut the number of accidents in recent years.

The cameras catching speeders beyond the S-curve, at J Avenue northbound and southbound near First Avenue, have struck many as more speed trap than safety measure. It's no wonder that the J Avenue camera has generated 40 percent of total ticket revenues.

Shutting it down means lost revenue, money that currently goes into the police budget. But city officials have been emphatic that the camera program is about safety, not money.

We're glad to hear the city is likely to move the S-curve entrance cameras. There's talk of appealing the two removal orders, but we think that would be a waste of time and resources. The DOT's conclusions make sense, and city leaders should comply.

' Comments: (319) 398-8469; editorial@thewgazette.com