Staff Editorials

Iowa Board of Regents must commit to transparency

A protester holds up a sign that reads
A protester holds up a sign that reads " Our Universities are not For Sale" during a rally of around 200 people including University of Iowa students, faculty, and staff who gathered outside the IMU to protest the Board of Regents decision to hire Bruce Harreld as the next UI President in Iowa City on Wednesday, Oct. 21, 2015. (Adam Wesley/The Gazette)

The state Board of Regents must reject a proposal to reduce the number of the board’s public meetings to the minimum required by state law.

Recoiling from the public’s view and restricting public access to board discussion is the opposite of the approach necessary to rebuild the public’s trust.

Documents obtained by The Gazette indicate the board expects to vote next month on a new meeting schedule and structure that would reduce the number of full board meetings — which have numbered seven or eight in recent years — to four, and to move committee meetings to a separate schedule.

Instead, regents should opt for a more robust meeting schedule and keep committee meetings linked with board meetings to increase public access to their public work.

We share former regent Bob Downer’s concern that “for what is now approaching a $5 billion enterprise, four meetings a year would not be adequate.”

In addition to potentially delaying board decisions about construction and other time-sensitive projects, the proposal appears to further stifle public awareness of and comment on board action.

That’s not a wise move for any public board, but especially foolhardy for one so stained in recent years by public perceptions of inside deals and closed-door activities.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

Questionable actions by regents during the hiring of University of Iowa President Bruce Harreld have led to sanctions from the American Association of University Professors and spurred two lawsuits.

More recently The Gazette learned that Gov. Terry Branstad met with one of his key political donors, Mike Richards, about “a possible appointment” days before Regent Mary Andringa submitted her letter of resignation. Two days after that letter arrived, Branstad appointed Richards to fulfill the remaining five years of Andringa’s term, effectively ending any public application process.

Amid charges they did too little to retain outgoing University of Northern Iowa President Bill Ruud, the regents now will embark on another nationwide presidential search.

The only way to repair the board’s reputation is to recommit to transparency, openness and responsiveness to the public’s concerns about the board.

Further limiting the public’s access to the public’s business seems an odd place to start.

• Comments: (319) 398-8469; editorial@thegazette.com

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.

CONTINUE READING

MORE Staff Editorials ARTICLES TO READ NEXT ...

Iowa has a comprehensive Energy Plan, crafted under the leadership of Gov. Kim Reynolds while she was lieutenant governor in 2016. And one of its four 'pillars' is 'Energy Efficiency and Conservation.''We will continue to embrace ...

Iowa politicians sent a clear message to the rest of the world this month - immigrants are not welcome here.Gov. Kim Reynolds signed legislation into law last week that aims to punish municipalities that don't fully cooperate with ...

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.