Letters to the Editor

Whitaker should remember he is temporary

It confounds logic and good sense for Matthew Whitaker, acting in his capacity as merely an interim U.S. Attorney General, to assume control of the Special Counsel’s investigations.

Deputy Rod Rosenstein has conducted oversight of Mueller’s work with unquestionable decency and ethical integrity. No one disputes that fact. So why should Rosenstein be shunted for doing his job so admirably?

It begs the question as to what Machiavellian motive prompted President Trump to assign Whitaker to the interim position, instead of Rosenstein, especially considering Whitaker lacks the credentials, the experience and the temperament of Rosenstein. Indeed, Rosenstein has more than proven his competence to be nominated as Jeff Sessions’ successor.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is already commanding Whitaker be replaced quickly by a duly vetted and Senate-confirmed Attorney General. The process could be speedily expedited if both Republican and Democratic senators pressured Trump to nominate Rosenstein. It should not be difficult for leading senators from both sides to garner the support needed to confirm Rosenstein’s appointment.

But, until a nominee is forthcoming from the President and confirmed, it would behoove Whitaker to act within the confines of established protocol and behave with caution and restraint consistent with his functioning as only a temporary caretaker of the Justice Department and not the head honcho.

Steven Pokorny

Urbandale

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.

CONTINUE READING

Want to join the conversation?

Consider subscribing to TheGazette.com and participate in discussing the important issues to our community with other Gazette subscribers.

Already a Gazette or TheGazette.com subscriber? Just login here with your account email and password.

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.