Front Rotator

Green groups demand EPA act on biofuels

Petition says feds are allowing prairies, wetlands being plowed

Bloomberg

Cornstalks stand at an orchard in Pennsylvania in October. More than a dozen environmental and conservation groups filed a petition this week alleging that the EPA is illegally looking the other way as farmers plow over prairies and wetlands to grow corn.
Bloomberg Cornstalks stand at an orchard in Pennsylvania in October. More than a dozen environmental and conservation groups filed a petition this week alleging that the EPA is illegally looking the other way as farmers plow over prairies and wetlands to grow corn.

More than a dozen environmental and conservation groups filed a petition Tuesday alleging that the EPA is illegally looking the other way as farmers plow over prairies and wetlands to grow corn needed to satisfy a U.S. biofuel mandate.

The Sierra Club, the National Wildlife Federation and other organizations asked the Environmental Protection Agency to force biofuel producers to prove the crops they use come from lands cultivated before Dec. 19, 2007, a benchmark under U.S. law.

The petition acts as a warning shot, signaling that if the EPA doesn’t address the issue, the groups could take the agency to court over it.

The move marks the escalation of a battle over the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard, a law that compels refiners to use corn-based ethanol and soybean-based biodiesel.

Once heralded as a cleaner, safer alternative to foreign oil, biofuels are now being questioned by environmentalists who dispute their green credentials.

“Millions of acres of previously uncultivated land have been converted to cropland” to satisfy the biofuel mandate “with far-reaching, deleterious environmental impacts,” the environmentalists say in their filing.

“Our air, water, land and wildlife are all suffering as a result.”

It wasn’t supposed to be this way. When Congress expanded the Renewable Fuel Standard as part of broad energy legislation in 2007, environmentalists pushed for safeguards designed to prevent land conversion, including a requirement that biofuels accepted under the program only come from previously farmed tracts.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

But instead of verifying that biofuel comes from crops grown on eligible, already cultivated land, the EPA chose to assess agricultural land use in aggregate.

The activists say the EPA’s broad approach of only looking at national cropland totals obscures the real picture on the ground because net acreage can remain the same nationwide if native grasses are plowed to grow corn for ethanol while existing farms are turned into subdivisions and shopping malls.

The EPA approach also violates the Renewable Fuel Standard’s “clear and unambiguous restriction” on land conversion, while undermining the measure’s intended climate and environmental objectives, they argue.

The activists are demanding the EPA end its aggregate approach, write new regulations requiring biofuel producers to prove the crops they use come from lands that already were cleared or cultivated before 2007, and lower annual biofuel quotas.

The EPA itself concluded in a June report that actively managed cropland has increased nationwide by 4 million, to 7.8 million acres, since 2007, with crop production for biofuels driving much of the increase.

Corn acreage also has gone up by approximately 10 million acres during the same time frame, the EPA report said.

Fertilizer runoff associated with growing crops for biofuel production may contribute to a dead zone and harmful algal blooms in the Gulf of Mexico that jeopardize sturgeon, sea turtles and other marine life, the EPA said.

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.

CONTINUE READING

Want to join the conversation?

Consider subscribing to TheGazette.com and participate in discussing the important issues to our community with other Gazette subscribers.

Already a Gazette or TheGazette.com subscriber? Just login here with your account email and password.

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.