News

DNC still has thumb on presidential primary scales

Democratic presidential candidates (from left) entrepreneur Andrew Yang, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Sen. Elizabeth
Democratic presidential candidates (from left) entrepreneur Andrew Yang, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and businessman Tom Steyer participate in a Democratic debate Thursday in Los Angeles. The standards for qualifying for next month’s debate are even more strict. (Chris Carlson/Associated Press)

If Iowa Democrats were concerned the national party has become too heavy-handed in this presidential primary, Friday’s news did nothing to quell those concerns.

The Democratic National Committee once again raised the threshold for candidates to qualify for the January debate, which will be held at Drake University in Des Moines. The December standards whittled the field of debate-eligible candidates to seven, and January’s could make the debate stage even less crowded.

As of Friday night, just five candidates would be eligible for the Iowa debate: Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar. Although there still is time for others to qualify, if no more do, that would leave 10 candidates off the debate stage.

For months, some Democrats have expressed concern the debate qualifications have replaced Iowa’s primary role in winnowing the field. Their fear is that the debates have displaced Iowans as the primary element vetting this expansive field.

The DNC does not seem to share the concern. Chairman Tom Perez pushed back at the suggestion when he was in Iowa earlier this year for the state party’s annual fall fundraiser. Perez insisted Iowans’ input still is important to the process, and that the national party’s qualification standards are not overly burdensome.

There are roughly 10 candidates and many Iowa Democrats who would disagree.

“The DNC’s job is to help elect Democratic candidates up and down the ballot. It is not to tell voters who those candidates should be,” U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., a presidential candidate, said in a statement. Bennet is one of the candidates whose polling numbers are well below the DNC’s debate-qualifying thresholds.

“This mission creep might make Tom Perez’s life a little easier — democracy’s inherent messiness has always been a burden for party bosses — but it does an enormous disservice to voters who want to know all of their options as they make this critical decision,” Bennet added. “Americans outside of Washington are just tuning into this primary. Instead of punishing them for doing so, Chairman Perez should revise these arbitrary thresholds and give every candidate a full and equal hearing before voting begins.”

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

The result has been a chicken-and-egg effect: qualifying for the debates, especially by reaching certain polling benchmarks, has become increasingly difficult, while raising polling numbers has proved difficult without being on the debate stages.

The scene in Des Moines on Jan. 14 promises to be interesting. It’s easy to imagine the campaigns of many of the candidates who fail to qualify for the debate showing up in Iowa to hold their own events.

It will be their attempt to speak directly to Iowans, the people they thought would be influencing this primary.

What a day

Speaking of that Iowa debate, it is scheduled for the same day Gov. Kim Reynolds will give her annual Condition of the State address to the Iowa Legislature. So, clear some extra time for your daily news consumption that day. The governor’s address and budget proposal will be delivered that morning, and the debate will be that evening.

All the news that’s fit to print, as they say.

Erin Murphy covers Iowa politics and government. His email address is erin.murphy@lee.net. Follow him on Twitter at @ErinDMurphy.

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.