116 3rd St SE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401
DAVENPORT — Members of a task force deliberating ways to address what is arguably the most pressing issue facing the Quad Cities — persistent gun violence — will continue to do so without the public's involvement.
Davenport Mayor Mike Matson, who formed the task force in June in response to a surge of shootings that reached an all-time high in 2020, said he asked task force members last week — on behalf of the Quad-City Times — during a meeting behind closed doors if they were willing to open their deliberations to the public.
Matson said “it was unanimous by everybody there to not have it public.”
“That was my decision to start,” Matson said of holding closed-door meetings of the task force. “Now, this is a group decision.”
Matson has expressed concerns that public meetings will squash candid discussion, saying he wanted to provide a “safe place” where task force members felt comfortable having direct and honest conversations about sensitive topics surrounding violence and trauma.
While the public will not be privy to the task force’s discussion, Matson has stressed they will not be left out of the loop, and encouraged community members who aren’t part of the task force to attend scheduled listening sessions during the coming months to hear updates about the group’s work.
Matson added it’s his objective to have the group draw up “some action items” for curbing violent crime.
“Certainly, the public will know those (recommendations),” he said.
Iowa open meetings law unclear
Iowa law does not provide clear guidance on whether ad-hoc committees, task forces or other advisory groups are subject to the state’s open meetings law.
Committees created by a government body are required to hold public meetings if they involve a majority of the members of the body itself and are formally and directly created by that body and exercise some policy- or decision-making authority.
The Iowa Supreme Court has said that policy-making “is more than recommending or advising what should be done. Policy-making is deciding with authority a course of action.”
Two Davenport aldermen sit on the task force — Ben Jobgen and Marion Meginnis — which the Davenport City Council and Matson never formally created, whether by resolution or executive order.
Rather, Matson, with help of city staff, simply asked community organizations and individuals “who seemed interested in the subject” whether they would be willing to participate.
While the task force is not required by law to meet in public, nothing in Iowa law prevents its meetings from being open to concerned people, Randy Evans, executive director of the Iowa Freedom of Information Council, wrote in a guest column published by the Iowa Capital Dispatch.
“Davenport residents have been shocked this year by near-weekly shootings there. In one incident, scores of bullets were fired from a downtown parking ramp, breaking windows at the nearby Figge Art Museum and at the Skybridge, a downtown tourist attraction,” Evans wrote. “But the committee meetings are not open to the public — even though police regularly plead for citizen help to fight crime.”
Too soon to go public, task force member says
Task force member Tracy Singleton, executive director of the Lincoln Center in Davenport, said she feels it is premature to involve the public.
“What’s going on in our community is a public health crisis,” Singleton said. “There is a sense of urgency, and if there’s a whole bunch of people in the room it’s harder to get things done. We need to put together a plan before we go to the public” to get input and buy-in.
Singleton added the task force consists of a representative sampling of the community.
“All the entities that need to be involved are,” she said, and noted individuals still can share their thoughts and ideas with task force members “who are accessible,” notably the mayor and aldermen.
Fellow task force member the Very Rev. Rudolph Juarez, pastor at St. Anthony Catholic Church in downtown Davenport, echoed Singleton.
Juarez said it’s important that task force members be allowed to “speak freely and not be on their guard” to share their “first thoughts and first insights” during initial discussions of the group.
“Our discussions and input will become public information and there will be times where the community will be asked to participate more on a wider basis,” Juarez said.