Letters to the Editor

Letter: Revenue from traffic cameras is needed

While the Iowa House struggles with the state budget cuts, saying that there is not enough revenue to support education, the state’s infrastructure (highways, parks, etc.), nor funds for environmental causes (clean water) or mental health resources; they are considering banning traffic cameras.

Why, because these cameras rake in so much revenue for the cities that have deployed them?

Maybe, instead of banning the cameras, they should consider deploying them along the highways that they are having so much trouble repairing and finding such difficultly in funding an adequate highway patrol.

The state could benefit from a steady source of revenue, improve public safety and wouldn’t have to raise any taxes. Why the state might be able to fund other safety-related items that are sorely needed, such as school bus stop arm cameras.

Paul Anderson

Cedar Rapids

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.

CONTINUE READING

MORE Letters to the Editor ARTICLES TO READ NEXT ...

We would like to offer condolences to the family of 18-year-old Jacob Markwell, who died in a crash on Otis Road SE on April 14.We are not surprised that this happened as a lot of drivers and motorcyclists do not obey the speed li ...

Regarding Robert Hartzler's April 12 letter 'Firearms should be treated like vehicles':I had to respond to Hartzler's ill advised letter regarding treating firearms like vehicles. I could go into a long line of arguments that have ...

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.