Letter: Pipeline ruling was unfair to landowners

So the judge won’t approve landowners’ request that the court act to hold up pipeline construction because they hadn’t tried other remedies first.

“They cannot skip a step in the process and now claim justification by an emergency. Any emergency is of their own making,” district judge Jeffrey Farrell ruled.

It seems to me that the same judgment ought to apply to the pipeline builder, Dakota Access, who plead that they’ve already invested too much in the project to be stopped now.

How come Dakota Access could go ahead before all the affected landowners were satisfied?

Harland Nelson



MORE Letters to the Editor ARTICLES TO READ NEXT ...

In the wake of yet another murderous rampage in which 17 high school students and faculty were slaughtered by a disturbed youth lawfully armed with an easily purchased weapon of war, the junior senator from Iowa again followed the ...

The latest school shooting has once again caused a full out assault against guns, gun owners and the National Rifle Association.I would like to touch on a few points for citizens who blame guns for this violence. School shooters k ...

Give us feedback

Have you found an error or omission in our reporting? Tell us here.

Do you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.