Letter: Pipeline ruling was unfair to landowners

So the judge won’t approve landowners’ request that the court act to hold up pipeline construction because they hadn’t tried other remedies first.

“They cannot skip a step in the process and now claim justification by an emergency. Any emergency is of their own making,” district judge Jeffrey Farrell ruled.

It seems to me that the same judgment ought to apply to the pipeline builder, Dakota Access, who plead that they’ve already invested too much in the project to be stopped now.

How come Dakota Access could go ahead before all the affected landowners were satisfied?

Harland Nelson



MORE Letters to the Editor ARTICLES TO READ NEXT ...

Isn't it interesting that the Cedar Rapids City Council wants to have input in the Cedar Rapids school board's reorganization of elementary schools? Maybe council members should consider allowing the school board input on city TIF ...

Dear Congressman Rod Blum, As a Representative of our State of Iowa, why is it when a person calls your office in Washington, D.C. the caller cannot even leave a message because the voice mail box is full? As a Congressman you sho ...

Give us feedback

Have you found an error or omission in our reporting? Tell us here.

Do you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.