Letters to the Editor

Letter: Pipeline ruling was unfair to landowners

So the judge won’t approve landowners’ request that the court act to hold up pipeline construction because they hadn’t tried other remedies first.

“They cannot skip a step in the process and now claim justification by an emergency. Any emergency is of their own making,” district judge Jeffrey Farrell ruled.

It seems to me that the same judgment ought to apply to the pipeline builder, Dakota Access, who plead that they’ve already invested too much in the project to be stopped now.

How come Dakota Access could go ahead before all the affected landowners were satisfied?

Harland Nelson

Decorah

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.

CONTINUE READING

MORE Letters to the Editor ARTICLES TO READ NEXT ...

A recent letter suggested that firearms should be regulated like vehicles ('Firearms should be treated like vehicles,' April 12). Great idea! How about we do the same with freedom of speech and freedom of religion? After all, if w ...

I retired from the Air Force as a firefighter after 23 years of service and I don't think a Veterans Administration-type system of health care should be extended to all Americans. If we make government-run health care available to ...

Give us feedback

We value your trust and work hard to provide fair, accurate coverage. If you have found an error or omission in our reporting, tell us here.

Or if you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.