Protect public broadcasting

The view from behind Iowa Public Television cameras during a taping in the mid-1970s.
The view from behind Iowa Public Television cameras during a taping in the mid-1970s.

President Donald Trump has proposed elimination of funding for public broadcasting. Yet, compared with other Western nations, the U.S. already provides less than anyone else.

A 2016 study of 18 Western nations for Canadian public broadcasting showed that the state funding leader was Norway, at more than $134 per person. Less than half that, and you have approximately France’s $54 per capita. At less than a fourth of what Norway pays, Italy spends $28, while our neighbors to the north commit $21. How much does the U.S. spend? About $2 per person per year. In fact, the U.S. spent less than 4 percent of the average of the 18 Western nations studied.

U.S. government support of public broadcasting funds less than one-fifth of the total budget. The majority of funds come from other sources: corporate underwriting and private member contributions. But the stations likely to suffer from cuts will be those in small markets, where federal funding makes up a greater percentage of the total operating budget. The greatest risk is in the places with the fewest free, over-the-air media choices.

It does no good to note that the federal government spent more on vacations for employees on administrative leave, or a single F-35 fighter jet, because the argument is not that public broadcasting is less wasteful than other government programs. The argument is that public broadcasting improves the quality of life for Americans in ways commercial service do not.

Public broadcasting has faced budget cuts before, and the argument always is the same: “the marketplace” will provide the things that government-supported broadcasting provides. That ignores reality. The trend in America is fewer households paying for cable or satellite. The poor are less likely to have paid television services, so the variety purported by marketplace proponents is not available to those who don’t pay a subscription fee.

The Smithsonian has billions of dollars of art and history in its collections, yet we don’t look to sell off the artifacts to balance the budget. You don’t destroy a national treasure for a few million dollars, or even a few billion. It’s an asset you’ll never be able to duplicate. That would be shortsighted. Public broadcasting also is a national treasure.

• Dom Caristi is a Ball State University professor of telecommunications



The recent shooting in Florida, like all past mass shootings, is tragic. I cannot begin to understand what parents feel, who lose a child, how they cope, or how they function after living through the worst day of their lives. I a ...

'Tommy's selling used cars, Nancy's fixing hair. Harvey runs a grocery store and Margaret doesn't care ...' I was sorting through files when I ran across an old newsletter from a high school classmate. The chatty missive mentione ...

Give us feedback

Have you found an error or omission in our reporting? Tell us here.

Do you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.