Nation & World

Senate reboot of Dodd-Frank expected

Changes expected to contain rare loss for Wall Street


Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Development Committee (center) speaks at a hearing in Washington, D.C., last month.
Bloomberg Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Development Committee (center) speaks at a hearing in Washington, D.C., last month.

The U.S. Senate is expected to approve a sweeping revamp of financial rules this week.

Of all the surprises that entails — about a dozen Democrats signing on, Republicans leaving a lot of the much-maligned Dodd-Frank legislation intact — the biggest is the lack of goodies for Wall Street.

Some big banks are lobbying right up to the vote in hopes of salvaging a victory because the legislation probably marks the last time lawmakers with full plates will take up financial regulations before November’s crucial midterm elections.

“Is there something more that is going to happen this Congress? You can make the case that it is hard to see,” said Ken Bentsen, CEO of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, a Wall Street lobbying group.

The bill has a good chance of becoming law. The U.S. House and President Donald Trump are eager to pass legislation reforming the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, and White House staff have been making calls to lawmakers to build support.

Sponsored by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, the bill seems intent on not helping the giant financial institutions that fueled populist anger in the lead-up to the 2008 crisis, and other businesses that have continued to trigger criticism.

Megabanks such as JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America could walk away almost empty-handed. And Equifax — the credit company that left millions of consumers vulnerable to identify theft after being hacked last year — might even be punished with tougher rules.

But it’s with government regulators, and not necessarily Congress, where Wall Street has known it would get most of its victories. With agencies such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency overseen by industry-friendly officials, among the regulations expected to be relaxed are the Volcker Rule, which prohibits banks from trading with their own cash, and lending rules that put brakes on predatory loans.


A core component of Crapo’s bill is giving small banks relief from a key provision in Dodd-Frank that they’ve been fighting to change for years.

It would raise to $250 billion from $50 billion the asset threshold for banks to be subject to stricter Federal Reserve oversight, freeing businesses such as American Express and SunTrust Banks from higher compliance costs associated with being considered “systemically important financial institutions,” or SIFIs.

Among the bill’s biggest losers are large regional businesses such as Capital One Financial and PNC Financial Services Group, whose SIFI designations would remain.

The legislation does allow big banks to include municipal bonds in required stockpiles of assets that could be sold to provide funding in a crisis. It’s a modification JPMorgan and Citigroup, especially, have pushed for years.

Wall Street still is lobbying for changes to the bill, including making one regulator responsible for the Volcker Rule, instead of the five agencies that now have a role in its implementation. The tweak, which is being sought by big banks such as Goldman Sachs Group could make it easier to relax the rule in the future.

The big banks also lobbied for relief in some capital requirements, but lost out. Instead, custodial banks such as State Street and Bank of New York Mellon are likely to see relief.

Big asset managers have been pushing to prevent the government from ever classifying businesses such as BlackRock and Fidelity Investments as SIFIs.

Capitol Hill staffers and lobbyists said they are skeptical that any changes helping Wall Street will make it into the legislation under the wire.


Thank you for signing up for our e-newsletter!

You should start receiving the e-newsletters within a couple days.

The measure still must pass the House, where some Republicans are likely to agitate for stripping away more regulation.

In many ways, Crapo’s bill forever enshrines the framework for post-2008 rules despite years of Republicans’ promises to gut Dodd-Frank and Trump’s pledge to do a “big number” on it about 14 months ago.

“Dodd Frank still is left in much of its form,” said Jim Nussle, president of the lobbying group Credit Union National Association. “That doesn’t change.”

The support of some Senate Democrats has been key to advancing the bill. Particularly supportive are Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Indiana’s Joe Donnelly, who are up for re-election in states that Trump won in 2016.

The bill has divided Democrats, magnifying the party’s divisions on financial issues. On one side are progressives such as Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who have attacked fellow Democrats for supporting a measure that she said is a handout to Wall Street and puts consumers at risk.

While the fighting isn’t expected to dim the bill’s chances of passing, it does create a wedge that could have implications in this year’s midterm elections as Democrats try to take back control of the House and Senate.

Crapo may consider a package of legislation later this year addressing the securities and trading industries, according to lobbyists and Capitol Hill staffers. That would give Wall Street another shot at lobbying Congress to make changes.



BEIJING - Chinese buyers of soybeans, the United States' biggest agricultural export to the country, are quietly drawing up contingency plans to ensure supplies of critical raw materials in the event of a trade war, sources said.T ...

PARIS - A gunman walked into a rural French supermarket, took hostages and opened fire Friday morning, in the latest attack in a country that has borne the brunt of Europe's recent struggle with terrorist violence. By midafternoon ...

Give us feedback

Have you found an error or omission in our reporting? Tell us here.

Do you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.