Like what you're reading?

We make it easy to stay connected:

to our email newsletters
Download our free apps

Bubble grows toward NCAA Selection Sunday

  • Photo

Entering last weekend there were three conference tournaments that had the potential for disrupting the hopes of at least one at-large team with NCAA tournament hopes. The conferences include the Missouri Valley, Ohio Valley and Sun Belt.

The Missouri Valley and Ohio Valley -- though hotly contested -- proved true to form with regular-season conference champions holding serve. The Sun Belt did not, however, and it sent yet another team to bubbleland.

Middle Tennessee State (28-5) finished the regular season 19-1 in conference play and are very competitive for an at-large spot. But the Blue Raiders were upset in the Sun Belt semifinals and could miss the NCAA tournament. It's a shame that perpetual one-bid conferences prefer to devalue four months of games in exchange for two compelling hours of ESPN airtime. Winning a regular-season conference championship means very little compared to a tournament title in about 30 conferences. But that's something for another day.

Middle Tennessee State has entered the bubble field and I've added two more teams: Charlotte and UMass. Not that I think either have value, but both have been mentioned by "experts" as a potential bubble squad. So here is a breakdown of the 22 squads considered for about eight spots in next week's NCAA tournament:



  • Cincinnati vs. Providence (Big East tournament)
  • Arizona State vs. Stanford (Pac-12 tournament)
  • Boise State vs. San Diego State (Mountain West tournament)


  • Baylor vs. Oklahoma State (Big 12 tournament)
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma (Big 12 tournament)
  • Charlotte vs. Richmond (A-10 tournament)
  • St. Joseph's vs. Xavier (A-10 tournament)
  • Wake Forest vs. Maryland (ACC tournament)
  • Vanderbilt vs. Arkansas (SEC tournament)
  • George Washington vs. UMass (A-10 tournament)
  • Northwestern vs. Iowa (Big Ten tournament)


VIRGINIA 20-10, 10-7 ACC

  • RPI: 66; Strength-of-schedule: 132
  • Record vs. top-100: 8-3 (2-2 vs. top-25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Duke, North Carolina State, Wisconsin, Tennessee, Maryland (twice), North Carolina
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Clemson, Old Dominion, Wake Forest, Boston College, Delaware, George Mason, Florida State
  • Looking ahead: ACC tournament (N.C. State/Virginia Tech)
  • The latest: After beating Maryland on Sunday, Virginia can clinch an at-large spot with two wins and possibly get in with one.

MARYLAND 20-9, 8-9 ACC

  • RPI: 83; Strength-of-schedule: 116
  • Record vs. top-100: 3-9 (1-4 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Duke, North Carolina State
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Kentucky, Florida State (twice), Boston College, Georgia Tech, Virginia
  • Looking ahead: ACC tournament (Wake Forest)
  • The latest: Sunday's loss at Virginia all but eliminates the Terrapins barring an ACC tournament title appearance. The Terrapins clearly are outside the tournament right now.


  • RPI: 46; Strength-of-schedule: 26
  • Record vs. top-100: 8-10 (1-4 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Marquette, Pittsburgh, Xavier, Oregon, Alabama, Iowa State, Villanova, UConn
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Providence, St. John’s
  • Looking ahead: Big East Tournament (Providence)
  • The latest: The Bearcats don’t have a loss to a team with a losing record and have played a competitive schedule. Cincinnati should get in with little difficulty.


  • RPI: 82; Strength-of-schedule: 62
  • Record vs. top-100: 5-9 (0-5 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Notre Dame, Cincinnati, Villanova (twice)
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): DePaul, Brown, Penn State, UMass, Cincinnati
  • Looking ahead: Big East Tournament (Cincinnati)
  • The latest: The early losses were horrific and although there are some decent wins as of late, the overall record and resume will keep Providence out of the NCAA tournament. Only a deep run in the Big East Tournament -- the Friars open with Cincinnati -- will get Providence back in the conversation.

IOWA 20-11, 9-9 BIG TEN

  • RPI: 76; Strength-of-schedule: 127
  • Record vs. top-100: 5-8 (1-6 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Iowa State, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Virginia Tech, Nebraska, Purdue
  • Looking ahead: Big Ten Tournament (Northwestern)
  • The latest: The lack of a big road win coupled with a subpar non-conference schedule means Iowa must do some work in the Big Ten tournament. A defining second-round league tournament win against Michigan State gets the Hawkeyes in the conversation. A semifinal victory probably gets them in.

IOWA STATE 21-10, 11-7 BIG 12

  • RPI: 47; Strength-of-schedule: 64
  • Record vs. top-100: 7-8 (2-5 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Baylor (twice), Kansas State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Iowa, Cincinnati, Texas Tech, Texas
  • Looking ahead: Big 12 Tournament (Oklahoma)
  • The latest: Iowa State appears almost a lock, although a near-collapse at West Virginia on Saturday could have turned some heads. Bottom line is a win against Oklahoma makes the Cyclones automatic.

BAYLOR 18-13, 9-9 BIG 12

  • RPI: 62; Strength-of-schedule: 21
  • Record vs. top-100: 5-10 (2-5 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Kentucky, Oklahoma State, Kansas
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): College of Charleston, Northwestern, Iowa State (twice), Texas
  • Looking ahead: Big 12 Tournament (Oklahoma State)
  • The latest: No team helped itself more on Saturday than Baylor, which dominated Kansas by 23 points. Baylor clearly is in the conversation but a loss to Oklahoma State could have the Bears outside looking in.

ARIZONA STATE 20-11, 9-9 PAC-12

  • RPI: 90; Strength-of-schedule: 122
  • Record vs. top-100: 5-8 (0-2 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Arkansas, Colorado (twice), UCLA, California
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): USC, Utah, DePaul, Washington (twice)
  • Looking ahead: Pac-12 Tournament (Stanford)
  • The latest: Barring a deep run in the Pac-12 Tournament, the Sun Devils just don't have a better resume than any other team on this list.

KENTUCKY 21-9, 12-6 SEC

  • RPI: 50; Strength-of-schedule: 65
  • Record vs. top-100: 7-9 (1-3 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Missouri, Ole Miss, Tennessee, Maryland, Florida
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Baylor, Texas A&M, Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee
  • Looking ahead: SEC tournament (Vanderbilt-Arkansas winner)
  • The latest: Kentucky's inconsistent season was perfectly defined last week with a 10-point loss at Georgia followed by a win against SEC regular-season champ Florida. The Wildcats look like a low-level NCAA team barring an SEC tournament loss to the Arkansas-Vanderbilt winner.

TENNESSEE 19-11, 11-7 SEC

  • RPI: 54; Strength-of-schedule: 38
  • Record vs. top-100: 9-9 (1-2 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Florida, Kentucky, Alabama, Xavier, Wichita State, Missouri
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Kentucky, Alabama, Ole Miss (twice), Georgia (twice), Arkansas, Virginia
  • Looking ahead: SEC tournament (South Carolina-Mississippi State winner)
  • The latest: The Volunteers won nine of their last 12, including wins against Florida and Missouri. An SEC tournament victory against South Carolina-Mississippi State probably gets Tennessee in the NCAA; two wins makes it automatic (second-day opponent is Alabama).

OLE MISS 23-8, 12-6 SEC

  • RPI: 56; Strength-of-schedule: 153
  • Record vs. top-100: 7-6 (0-1)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Alabama, Tennessee (twice), Arkansas, Missouri
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Mississippi State, Indiana State, Kentucky, South Carolina, Texas A&M
  • Looking ahead: SEC tournament (Missouri-Auburn/Texas A&M winner)
  • Prognosis: Like the rest of the SEC, Ole Miss’ fate could come down to the conference tournament. A Friday loss (likely to Missouri) means a probable NIT spot.

ALABAMA 20-11, 12-6 SEC

  • RPI: 60; Strength-of-schedule: 91
  • Record vs. top-100: 7-7 (0-2 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee, Villanova
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Ole Miss, Auburn, LSU, Tennessee, Mercer, Tulane, Dayton, Cincinnati
  • Looking ahead: SEC tournament (Tennessee-Mississippi State/South Carolina)
  • Prognosis: Alabama beat Georgia by three points Saturday on an amazing half-court buzzer-beater to keep its NCAA hopes alive. But the Crimson Tide ’s resume is weaker most of its fellow SEC bubble competitors so it must win a couple head-to-head battles in the SEC tournament, like against Friday's probable opponent, Tennessee.

ARKANSAS 19-12, 10-8 SEC

  • RPI: 78; Strength-of-schedule: 82
  • Record vs. top-100: 6-10 (2-3 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Kentucky, Missouri, Florida, Tennessee, Oklahoma
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Texas A&M, Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Alabama, South Carolina, LSU, Arizona State
  • Looking ahead: SEC tournament (Vanderbilt)
  • Prognosis: Arkansas just has too many losses to mediocre or comparable opponents, coupled with three defeats in the last five. A 30-point road loss at Missouri on Tuesday probably sealed its postseason fate barring at least three wins in the SEC tournament.

BOISE STATE 21-9, 9-7 Mountain West

  • RPI: 38; Strength-of-schedule: 69
  • Record vs. top-100: 8-7 (2-5 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Colorado State, UNLV, Creighton, San Diego State
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Nevada, Air Force, Utah
  • Looking ahead: vs. San Diego State (Mountain West Tournament)
  • Prognosis: Boise State took out San Diego State on Saturday to pad its NCAA resume. The Broncos have a nice middle-of-the-road resume with a couple decent wins and a few regrettable losses. One more win probably gets Boise State in the NCAA while two likely clinches it.

LA SALLE 21-8, 11-5 Atlantic-10

  • RPI: 39; Strength-of-schedule: 88
  • Record vs. top-100: 6-7 (2-1 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Villanova, Butler, VCU
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Temple, UMass, Xavier, Central Connecticut, Bucknell
  • Looking ahead: A-10 tournament (George Washington)
  • The latest: A 24-point loss at St. Louis hurts the Explorers' chances of staying in the conversation. La Salle might need at least two or three A-10 tournament wins to gain consideration outside of East Coast experts.

XAVIER 17-13, 9-7 Atlantic-10

  • RPI: 79; Strength-of-schedule: 54
  • Record vs. top-100: 5-8 (2-2 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): St. Louis, La Salle, Temple, Memphis, Butler
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): UMass, Dayton, Tennessee, St. Louis, Cincinnati, Charlotte, St. Joseph’s, Wofford, Vanderbilt, Pacific, Wake Forest
  • Looking ahead: A-10 tournament
  • Prognosis: Xavier lost at Butler and now must advance deep in the A-10 tournament to have any shot. The Muskateers have the perfect NIT resume.

TEMPLE 23-8, 11-5 Atlantic-10

  • RPI: 36; Strength-of-schedule: 59
  • Record vs. top-100: 10-5 (2-3 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Villanova, Syracuse, La Salle, St. Louis, VCU
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Canisius, Xavier, Duquesne, St. Joseph’s, St. Bonaventure,
  • Looking ahead: Atlantic-10 Tournament
  • Prognosis: Of the A-10 bubble teams, Temple has the best case. There are a few concerning losses, but the Owls have won seven straight games and have 10 top-100 wins.

ST. MARY’S 27-6, 14-2, West Coast Conference

  • RPI: 33; Strength-of-schedule: 104
  • Record vs. top-100: 6-4 (0-3 vs. top-25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Creighton
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Northern Iowa, Pacific, Georgia Tech
  • Looking ahead: Season complete
  • Prognosis: Other than a win against Creighton, it’s a pretty nondescript campaign for the Gaels. There are more losses to non-NCAA tournament teams than wins against solid competition. When you add in three losses to Gonzaga (plus possible NCAA sanctions, another NCAA heartbreak is possible.

SOUTHERN MISS 23-8, 12-4 Conference USA

  • RPI: 37; Strength-of-schedule: 79
  • Record vs. top-100: 5-7 (0-3 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): None
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Marshall, Central Florida, Louisiana Tech, New Mexico State
  • Looking ahead: C-USA tournament
  • Prognosis: Southern Miss has a nice record but offers little else compared to the high-major teams who have played — and beaten — competitive teams in and out of conference play. It should take a Conference USA tournament title to clinch an NCAA berth.

UMASS 19-10, 9-7 Atlantic-10

  • RPI: 57; Strength-of-schedule: 83
  • Record vs. top-100: 8-8 (0-3 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Providence, La Salle, Xavier
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Tennessee, Charlotte, Temple
  • Looking ahead: A-10 Tournament (Georgetown)
  • The latest: To read some blogs, the Minutemen are very competitive for an at-large spot. I think they'd make a nice rematch for Providence in the NIT.

CHARLOTTE 20-10, 8-8 Atlantic-10

  • RPI: 63; Strength-of-schedule: 113
  • Record vs. top-100: 7-7 (1-2 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Butler, UMass, Xavier, La Salle
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Temple (twice)
  • Looking ahead: A-10 Tournament (Richmond)
  • The latest: Some smart people have tried to make a case for Charlotte as an at-large team. I don't see it.


  • RPI: 28; Strength-of-schedule: 135
  • Record vs. top-100: 2-3 (0-2 vs. top 25)
  • Good wins (includes bubble teams): Ole Miss
  • Bad losses (includes bubble teams): Akron, Belmont, Tennessee State, Florida International
  • Looking ahead: Season complete
  • The latest: The Blue Raiders are very competitive for an at-large spot because of their RPI and overall record. They're 2-1 against the SEC, including a head-to-head win against Ole Miss. But they have a tenuous position, especially if the other teams on this list get hot in their conference tournaments.


Give us feedback

Have you found an error or omission in our reporting? Tell us here.
Do you have a story idea we should look into? Tell us here.